Down the DRAIN: California gets a jump on Delta tunnels

The intake structure for the first Delta tunnel was completed and began to transport water this winter to the central Delta. Photo source: Gus Tolley

by Nan W. and Dunlay J. Frobish

California took a step towards replumbing its archaic Delta water infrastructure by completing the first part of a contentious project. An intake for the first Delta tunnel was completed this fall, and with the return of wet weather, began transporting flows that will eventually bypass the Delta entirely.

Officially named the “Diversion Restoring Almonds Intake,” or DRAIN, the diversion intake conveys water into the central Delta to improve water quality and combat damage to water supplies and Delta ecosystems done by salt-water intrusion during the recent drought.

“The writing was on the wall for California’s big infrastructure projects,” said Rowe Foote, a legislative aide in the governor’s office. “The tunnels and the bullet train are our biggest goals. We need to get them done. We took a page from recent national election rhetoric: build now, get buy-in and pay later.”

Map of proposed Bay Delta Conservation Plan Dual Conveyance tunnel project. One of multiple potential intake locations was selected for the DRAIN. Source: California Natural Resources Agency

Since Californians have yet to approve full project funding, the first tunnel could only be partially completed using existing discretionary funds and a loan from Proposition 1 funds to improve access to south-of-Delta storage. Fiscal hawks in the governor’s office demanded that construction be limited to structures within the available budget, and that would provide on-going benefit regardless of whether future phases were ultimately approved.

The open bell-mouth DRAIN is unique for intake designs, and was selected because it physically limits diversions to surplus flows and can passively operate until future bonds and plans are approved. The passive structure means that intake flows will mimic the hydrograph, peaking when flows are high and receding as flows are low. Studies have shown that this kind of direct “functional flow” strategy helps preserve complex stream processes without overly complex interventions.

Record low reservoirs following the 2011-2016 drought gave California ample opportunity to complete construction of the bell-mouth intake for the first Delta tunnel. Photo credit: Dagon Jones.

The impetus behind fast-tracking the DRAIN’s construction came when poor water quality for local Delta intakes coincided with increasing reports of marine animals in streams and canals. Sea lions have been reported in Knights Landing, Dixon, and Vacaville, and several reports of whales in the Sacramento River.

Spectators watch as one of two humpback whales partially surfaces near the Port of Sacramento. Image source: U.S. Coast Guard via EPA.

“Our environmental flow policy is barely enough to keep fish the size of Delta smelt in the right place,” said Chuck Laird, a spokesperson for the state’s Natural Resources Agency. “It’s really no surprise that with the amount of salt-water intrusion, we’re starting to see marine mammals in places that used to be reliably fresh water habitat.”

“While California’s drought may be easing, the environment has essentially been in a drought for decades,” said the Center for Watershed Sciences LeRoy Tempe. “Combine the salt-water intrusion with flow reversals from the Delta pumps, and you’ve got whales swimming into our rivers while [Delta] smelt and juvenile salmon don’t know which way to go.”

Delta flows are notoriously convoluted. It is the hub of California’s critical infrastructure, conveying fresh water from the wetter northern part of the state to farms and cities in the drier south. But tidal “sloshing” greatly exceeds Delta outflows: as a result, inland channels like the dredged Sacramento Deep Water Ship channel has extended tidal mixing, bringing salty, tidal water up the channel. Experts have long warned that fresh water to the environment has been under-allocated in the Delta, and that its ecosystem won’t recover until those flows are restored.

The DRAIN’s use will be limited until Phase 2 can be implemented: the construction of a device to Prevent/Limit Unnecessary Gushing (the PLUG) can be fitted to improve the reliability of water deliveries.

Nan W. Frobish is an occasional contributor to the California Waterblog and director of life enrichment for the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. Dunlay J. Frobish performs multiphase fluid flow experiments throughout the Delta.

Further reading

Bay Delta Conservation Plan. 2013 Public Review Draft BDCP.

Yarnell et al. 2015. Functional flows in modified riverscapes: hydrographs, habitats and opportunities. Bioscience.

Fleenor et al. 2017. Episode 1: “Unraveling the Knot” Water movement in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. California WaterBlog.

Fleenor et al. 2017. Episode 2: “Unraveling the Knot” Water movement in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. California WaterBlog.

California WaterBlog. 2015. Q & A on survival of California’s Delta smelt.

 

This entry was posted in April Fools' Day, California Water, Delta. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Down the DRAIN: California gets a jump on Delta tunnels

  1. David Breninger says:

    Greetings,
    Great April fools’ story. Unfortunately, the State with the expert help of DWR who successfully operated Oroville dam’s two spillways to near total destruction and who pride themselves on the State’s other ‘dam’ project in the Delta, the Twin Tunnels, deserve all the credit they create. Even now, the State has literally gone underground to hide Oroville spillway documents in order to again keep the public in the dark as to the ‘fix’ and cost for the spillway re-construction. Read the real-news on this unfortunate ‘state of affairs’ on Oroville in today’s Sacramento BEE with strong-words of grave concern expressed from State Senator Jim Nielsen and Friends of the River Ron Stork. The State’s interest seems to be ‘the people be dammed’ and never let a self-imposed ‘state of emergency’ go to waste – just break everything you can with the time you have available to do so. To State officials it is just another foolish day messing up California water policy.
    David B.

    Like

  2. Tom Kruse says:

    Is this some sort of April Fool’s joke?

    Tom Kruse Vineyardist and Winemaker

    Like

  3. Joseph Rizzi says:

    LOL… I love the DRAIN concept.

    Like

  4. Barbara Linderholm says:

    The photos show the drain at Lake Berryessa just above the Monticello Dam. Is this the type of “drain” the article discusses? Where exactly is it, or will it be, located? How is “surplus” water defined? And where would that water go without the dran in place?

    Like

  5. J. Lauchland Shaw vineyard says:

    Finally, the towns and cities are more clear or added to maps. Some pictures are not of the Delta, can you please identify the maps as to the drain. Restore pure, deep dredging with soil purification. Federal funds for Delta levee maintenance was sent to Washington State, for a former US Senator in 2014 (Sacramento Bee). Debris and poor maintenance, was reported at 80% NON-COMPLIANCE (CVFCB workshop, July 2015). From neglect, news photos were of algae in Port of Stockton, flooding, etc. Maps and photos help but locals need to know the nearest town and/or county to identify it. There has been a first intake at Freeport (part for East Bay MUD) for 10 years. What is this new “first intake”, or does that mean a second tunnel, stop shorting our groundwater, with NASA reports of subsidence?

    Like

  6. TP says:

    Is this supposed to be a joke?

    Like

  7. Excellent article! I enjoyed it almost as much as the manatees in the delta story you published a couple of years ago.

    Like

  8. Tom Arthur says:

    The state has also recently funded the importing of martian water. For less than $5M/gallon of water they predict some of the purest water in the galaxy.

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/13/nasas-curiosity-rover-finds-water-below-surface-of-mars

    Like

  9. mgeraght says:

    Has anyone considered the System Collector Unfiltered Material (SCUM) problem that occurs with all drain-type solutions? Just asking.

    Like

  10. What’s the point in a bullet train that nobody will use? Everyone needs water & food. Priorities peoples.

    CA must fix the water situation first!

    Like

Leave a Comment (moderated)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s