Floods, farms, fowl, and fish: a confluence of successful management

By Eric Holmes

yolo_bypass

Figure 1: Map of the Yolo Bypass, courtesy of Amber Manfree.

The floodplain smorgasbord is open! Wrapping up a successful fifth season, the Knaggs Nigiri  project, partnered with California Trout and the California Department of Water Resources, places fall run juvenile Chinook salmon in inundated rice fields during a six week period in February and early March, the non-rice-growing season.  The project has implications for improving the condition of the fish and the chances of survival by giving them access to floodplain habitat.

Historically, large areas of floodplain habitat in the Central Valley were available to salmon during the winter and spring months.  Regulation of river flows combined with alteration of river channel geometry by construction of levees and channelization have vastly reduced the amount of floodplain habitat.  California’s water infrastructure is designed for flood control and water supply during the dry summer months, but has inadvertently cut off a valuable habitat for rearing juvenile salmon.

How do we reconcile these seemingly competing interests?  The answer is simple: use our existing infrastructure, with some minor modifications, to create “surrogate” floodplains in rice fields during the non-growing season.

zooplankton

Figure 2: Zooplankton from the Nigiri project fields at Knaggs Ranch. Photos by Miranda Tilcock.

These surrogate floodplains serve as engines of productivity when the water is spread out by increasing the solar influx and driving production of a robust food web.  Fish are provided a rich diet of large zooplankton (figure 2).  At times the water is so full of large zooplankton that the fish appear to be swimming in a “Zoop-Soup.”  The fish respond by gaining weight and length at rates that far surpass growth rates of fish confined to the channelized river.

Eventually, modification of our existing infrastructure includes plans for an operable structure in Fremont Weir, which will allow salmon and river water access to the productive habitats of the Yolo Bypass even at relatively low flows.  Modified operable weirs in the Bypass itself will allow water to be impounded, providing floodplain habitat to wild-origin salmon migrating out to the ocean.  This impoundment will allow for robust floodplain food webs to establish, giving these fish access to better food resources than in the main river.  Access to the Yolo Bypass also has the potential to give the juvenile salmon a better migration corridor and a more direct route to the Pacific Ocean.  The modified system will be capable of providing floodplain habitat during drought conditions

salmon

Figure 3: Comparison of juvenile salmon, one confined to the river (top) and one with access to a surrogate floodplain for 3 weeks (bottom). Otholith (ear bone) analysis showed that the two fish in the photo are only 4 days difference in age. Photo by Carson Jeffres.

when it can have the most profound impact.

Reconciling our needs for water supply, agricultural food production, and flood control with the needs of fish and other ecological needs for birds is not impossible.  With some creative thinking and engineering modifications to our existing infrastructure we will be able to have a productive system that takes into account floods, farms, feathers, and fish!

Eric Holmes is researcher at the Center for Watershed Sciences. His work focuses on salmonid restoration and research projects in California’s complex ecosystems.

Further reading

Ryan Sabalow. “Salmon Experiment Gets New Twist in Yolo Bypass.” Sacramento Bee. Feb. 19, 2016.

“Project Nigiri Celebrates Five Years on the Floodplain.” UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences.

“A Sweet Spot for Farms and Fish on a Floodplain.” California Water Blog.

“Reconciling Fish and Fowl with Floods and Farming.” California Water Blog.

“Innovations in Floodplain Modeling a Test Drive on the Yolo Bypass.” California Water Blog.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Floods, farms, fowl, and fish: a confluence of successful management

  1. Stan says:

    Also could help with ground water recharge.

    Like

  2. Mark Fasi says:

    What is the source of the Zooplankton?

    Like

  3. Mike Hamblet says:

    Great project – hope more farmers realise the benefit of extra nutrients in the topsoil

    Like

  4. Thanks! Finally I got your articles
    from where I have the capacity to take helpful Information
    concerning my study and knowledge.

    Like

  5. Pingback: The Horror of a Salmon’s Wheel of Misfortune | California WaterBlog

  6. Pingback: BLOG ROUND-UP: How reducing river flows harms SF Bay, Why instream flows should be law, Ag losses, Salmon wheel of misfortune, The beach that ate Silicon Valley; New plans for old dams?; and more … | MAVEN'S NOTEBOOK | Water news

Leave a Comment (moderated)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s