By Jenny Ta and Joshua Viers
It seems inevitable that increasing numbers of California farmers will see their claims to surface water suspended this growing season as the drought persists into a fourth year.
The State Water Resources Control Board said as much Friday (June 12) when it extended drought-related prohibitions on river diversions to irrigators with rights dating to 1903 in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its watersheds. The order marked the first time California has limited water use for senior water rights holders since the 1976-77 drought.
The prospect of such draconian cutbacks convinced about 200 Delta farmers with priority dates earlier than 1903 they would be better off giving up water before they began planting. In May, they negotiated an agreement with the water board to voluntarily surrender 25 percent of water supplies (from 2013 levels) this June – September growing season.
Across California, other farmers and ranchers with senior water rights will likely seek similar deals to pre-empt potentially steeper mandatory cuts. Common ways to reduce diversions from streams include voluntary curtailments, water exchanges, conjunctive use and water purchases.
The UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences recently developed a tool to quantitatively evaluate these water management options. Working with the Nature Conservancy, we designed the model to assess strategies for restoring populations of native fish on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Sacramento River.
Mill Creek hosts one of the highest elevation salmon-spawning habitats in California and is one of the few streams that still support threatened spring-run Chinook salmon. It winds southwest from Mount Lassen through a narrow canyon until it reaches the Sacramento Valley. Before joining the Sacramento River, the creek flows through the small Tehama County community of Los Molinos, where landowners with senior water rights divert flows to irrigate nut orchards and cattle pasture.
Tehama County Superior Court adjudicated Mill Creek water rights in 1920, allocating the stream’s entire discharge during low summer flows. As a result, the stream routinely goes almost completely dry during irrigation season (June through mid-October). At the request of state and federal fisheries regulators, local irrigators voluntarily agreed to provide flows for the spring and fall salmon migration this drought year and last. This year’s curtailment orders have not affected these senior water rights holders — so far.
Stream flow is critical to sustaining riverine plants and animals, many of which have adapted to historic flow patterns. These species include the foothill yellow-legged frog, whose reproduction is timed with the annual spring snowmelt, and Pacific salmon that migrate up the Sacramento and spawn in the creek.
Our water management tool is an easy-to-use spreadsheet model that calculates and identifies environmental-flow shortages based on seasonal diversion demands and water management scenarios, such as water exchanges, water-rights purchases and substituting groundwater for creek water.
For example, we analyzed strategies for providing fish-passage flows during the spring and fall migration of Chinook salmon and steelhead trout, species of particular interest to wildlife managers.
The model identified late October as a period of water scarcity for irrigation and fish passage in both dry and wet years. Fish-flow shortages ranged from 1,600 to 2,450 acre-feet of water annually from wet to dry years, as illustrated above.
Our analysis showed that if irrigators left their water in the stream a few weeks during fall migration (late October through early November) — in return for the conservancy availing its share of creek water to irrigators from July to early October, shortages to fish-passage flows would be reduced by about 60 percent. (See table below, under “Agreement”.) If, in addition to the water exchange, irrigators pumped more water from wells instead of the creek, the passage flows could potentially be fully restored.
We did not address all factors that need to be considered in reducing water diversions, such as groundwater-river water interactions, water quality and economic trade-offs. But the tool is a useful first step in deciding how to address environmental water shortages in diverted creeks and rivers. Other salmon-bearing streams such as Deer Creek in Tehama County and the Eel River in northwestern California face similar water management challenges.
Fish-water needs aside, California landowners with senior water rights are on notice this drought year that curtailments are likely if not imminent. Those looking to pre-emptively cut a deal with the state water board, as many Delta farmers did, may benefit from quantitatively evaluating their water management options.
Jenny Ta is a graduate student of hydrologic sciences at the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. Joshua Viers is an associate professor at UC Merced and co-director of the UC Water Security and Sustainability Research Initiative.
Grantham T and Viers J. “California water rights: You can’t manage what you don’t measure.” California WaterBlog. Aug. 20, 2014
Ta, Jenny. “Decision support tool for water management and environmental flows: Mill Creek case study.” Masters thesis. UC Davis. May 25, 2015
Willis A, et al. “A salmon success story during the California drought.” California WaterBlog. Jan. 20, 2015
Yarnell S. “How dam operators can breathe more life into rivers.” California WaterBlog. Feb. 1, 2015
Yarnell S. “Life springs in Sierra Rivers as springtime flows recede.” California WaterBlog, May 4, 2013
Yarnell S. Sierra frogs breed insights on river management. California WaterBlog. Oct. 3, 2012
Pingback: Blog round up: Who pays for infrastructure damaged by subsidence?, Is 2% enough to save the salmon industry?, California water management dilemma, CEQA and the drought, and more …MAVEN'S NOTEBOOK | MAVEN'S NOTEBOOK
Pingback: Spreadsheets for the 4th year of CA drought | Water in Utah
Pingback: Making the most of little water — with spreadsheets - CITRIS
I take issue with Ms. Ta’s data and her inaccurate understanding of the agreements and operations of the water exchange programs on Mill Creek. I would look forward to meeting with her and discussing her Thesis. I would have thought she would have interviewed the staff of Los Molinos Mutual Water Co. to get a full understanding of of the cooperation going on between the diverters and California Fish and Wildlife.over the last 30 years
Thanks for your interest in this study, Mr. Mullins. In general, these preliminary studies are developed as proof-of-concepts to see if the approach would generally work, but they are not meant to capture with precision all the details of water management. We agree that any proof-of-concept work would benefit from close collaboration with local stakeholders and strongly encourage this as part of future work. We apologize for not making the preliminary, proof-of-concept nature of her thesis more clear in this post.
This article describes the potential of using modeling to identify instream flow needs and also evaluate methods of providing the required flows using Mill Creek as the example. In the article and in her thesis Ms.Ta did an admirable job of demonstrating the utility of this modeling. Beyond the purposes of the article it is important to note that the Los Molinos Mutual Water Company has utilized the techniques modeled in the article to provide instream flows to support the passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead trout in Mill Creek. Specifically the Company has partnered for many years with the California Departments of Fish and Wildlife and Water Resources to operate two conjunctive use wells and more recently with The Nature Conservancy to implement a water exchange agreement. These two tools result in instream flows of between 40 and 60 cubic feet per second that are released as pulse flows in the spring and continuous flows in the fall to facilitate salmonid passage through the lower portion of Mill Creek. Additionally, the Company recently been awarded funding to develop a master plan for water efficiency improvements to its water distribution system that will allow additional instream flows. It is important to recognize that the Los Molinos Mutual Water Company has an exemplary record of actions that provide substantial instream flows for fish passage.