By Jay Lund

. . .

October 1 marks the beginning of California’s new Water Year (WY). Water years here run from October 1 until September 30 of the next calendar year and are named for the calendar year of the bulk of the water year (January – October).

October 1 is also the nominal beginning of California’s wet season. (No significant rain yet, by the way.) California’s hydrology has two basic seasons, wet and dry, with the wet season nominally from October 1 – April 1 (Figure 1). The first sizable storm sometimes arrives in late September and sometimes not until November (recently in 2021). Sizable storms rarely arrive after April.

A vertical bar chart titled “Northern Sierra 8-Station Precipitation Index for Water Year 2026,” comparing monthly precipitation totals with average precipitation from October through September. Turquoise bars represent water year 2026 totals, and short blue horizontal markers represent average values. The y-axis shows precipitation in inches from 0 to 16, and the x-axis lists the water-year months.

Water year 2026 precipitation totals are: October 3.0 inches, November 7.7, December 15.6, January 6.7, February 8.2, March 0.1, April 7.8, May 1.4, June 0.3, July 0.1, August 0.0, and September 0.7. Average values are: October 2.8 inches, November 5.3, December 10.0, January 9.1, February 8.9, April 4.3, May 2.8, June 1.1, July 0.1, August 0.2, and September 0.5. March has no visible average marker or label. December has the highest 2026 total, while March through August show very little precipitation.

Alt-text:

Bar chart comparing Northern Sierra monthly precipitation totals for Water Year 2026 with average values; December is highest at 15.6 inches, while March through August are near zero.
Figure 1. Northern California average and WY 2026 precipitation – a bouncy year. https://cdec.water.ca.gov/images/WYPrecip/BAR_ESI.PNG

As we leave California’s long 2026 dry season and prepare, hopefully, for the wet season, it is good to reflect on the last water year and prepare for what is also California’s flood season. This is commonly a time for largely futile predictions and speculations of precipitation and runoff for the coming 12 months.

The 2026 water year was near-average when averaged across the state (Figure 2). Not too wet. No major floods. Not a drought. Slightly drier than the 2025 water year. The 2024 water year was also unusually average. California has now had three unusually normal water years (averaged statewide), after a fairly wild decade of dry and wet years. This is the longest run of near-average years since the late 1990s.

A precipitation statistics chart summarizes statewide precipitation for the water year as of September 26, 2026, using records from 1981 to the present. The left side reports 22.56 inches of precipitation to date, which is 95% of the historical average. It also states that precipitation for the full water year through September 30 is 95% of average. Historical values to date are a maximum of 42.61 inches, a mean of 23.63 inches, and a minimum of 11.8 inches.

On the right, a vertical bar chart uses an axis ranging from 0 to 40 inches. A light-blue bar reaches 42.61 inches to represent the historical maximum, while a dark-blue bar reaches 22.56 inches for the current water year. A red horizontal line marks the historical average at 23.63 inches. The chart concludes that precipitation for the water year to date is 95% of the historical average.

Alt-text:

Statewide precipitation is 22.56 inches as of September 26, 2026—95% of the historical average of 23.63 inches; the historical maximum is 42.61 inches.
Figure 2. 2025 Water Year and Average Statewide Precipitation in inches – near average. https://cww.water.ca.gov/
A color-coded map of California showing water-year-to-date precipitation as a percentage of average on September 26, 2026. Most of the state is shaded bright green, representing 80–120% of average precipitation. Areas in blue and teal, indicating 120–200% of average, appear mainly in parts of central and southern California, while yellow and orange areas, indicating 40–80%, are concentrated in portions of southeastern California. Small red and dark-red patches, representing 0–40%, are scattered across the state. A vertical legend appears to the lower left of the map.

Alt-text:

Color-coded map of California showing water-year-to-date precipitation percentages of average on September 26, 2026, with most areas between 80% and 120%.
Figure 3. WY 2026 California precipitation map – bigger-than-usual north-south differences https://cww.water.ca.gov/

Figure 3 shows that for WY 2026, most of California had near-average total precipitation (about 95% on average). But as is typical, some months were unusually wet (December and April), and others were unusually dry (March) (Figure 1). (The mathematics of averages usually require drought years to have more dry months and fewer wet months.)

2026 WY had less precipitation variability across the state than usual – unusually average in time and space (Figure 3), but still with substantial variability across months.

Northern California tends to be wetter and southern California to be drier. Also, California is large with much local variability, but seemingly with fewer deviations than usual from local averages in 2026 than in most years – California’s weather and climate are often spotty within regional tendencies.

What is the California water system’s current condition in terms of water storage? What is the likelihood of floods or drought in WY 2026? What should we do now?

Storage going into 2026 Water Year

A three-panel line chart titled “California Snow Water Content, June 5, 2026, Percent of April 1 Average.” The panels show snow-water-content trends for the North, Central, and South regions from December through July. Each panel has a vertical scale from 0 to 300 percent and multiple colored lines representing the 1991–2020 average, selected maximum and minimum years, and individual water years from 2021–2022 through 2025–2026. A pale cyan shaded band marks the historical average range.

In the North panel, the green maximum-year line rises above 200 percent during March and April before declining toward zero by July. Other lines generally peak between approximately 50 and 125 percent and approach zero by June or July. In the Central panel, the green line peaks near 240 percent in March and declines to zero by July; the other lines remain mostly below 110 percent. In the South panel, the green line reaches approximately 300 percent in March and April before falling to zero by July; the remaining lines peak below approximately 110 percent.

The horizontal axis is labeled by month from December through July. A dark gray “Editor canvas” overlay partially covers the upper portion of the North panel. The chart lists current regional percentages of the April 1 average as 0 for the North, 4 for the Central region, and 1 for the South.

Alt-text:

Three-panel line chart showing California snow-water-content percentages for the North, Central, and South regions from December through July, with historical averages and selected water years.
Figure 4: California snowpack accumulations in Water Year 2026 and historically.

The paths of snow accumulation in recent years of near-average precipitation (including 2026) tend to be well below statistically average snow levels in the spring. This has some implications for reservoir and groundwater recharge operations. In almost any year, there is almost no carryover of snowpack across years (except some as groundwater recharge).

Storage in most major California surface reservoirs today (at the end of the irrigation and dry seasons) tends to be a small percent of storage capacity. However, as a percent of average reservoir storage at this time of year, most large reservoirs are a little below last year at this time, but still near or above average: https://cdec.water.ca.gov/reportapp/javareports?name=RESSW. If the coming water year is moderately dry, this storage will be helpful for cities and agriculture. 

Groundwater is by far California’s largest supply of stored water, particularly for droughts. Despite passage of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) and a few wettish years, some San Joaquin and Tulare basins continue to deepen their groundwater overdraft and land subsidence, challenging compliance with SGMA by 2040. But some groundwater levels have been improving substantially. DWR’s groundwater data site (Groundwater Live) provides some useful data on groundwater levels and subsidence: https://sgma.water.ca.gov/CalGWLive/. 

Spencer Cole at PPIC recently published some encouraging results on changes in Central Valley groundwater levels since 2021 (Figure 5). Dry years and average years have major overdraft, with wet years having substantial net recharge. Overall, there is some reduction in the overdraft rate (but sizable overdraft continues).

A three-panel vertical bar chart compares annual changes in aquifer storage, measured in thousand acre-feet per year (taf/year), across three California groundwater regions: Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin River, and Tulare Lake Basin. Each panel shows values for 2021–2025, a recent average for 2021–25, and a baseline average for 2003–10. Bars extending above the zero line indicate increases; bars below it indicate decreases.

The Sacramento Valley panel uses dark blue bars. Values are −1,730 in 2021, −936 in 2022, 1,082 in 2023, 546 in 2024, 181 in 2025, −171 for the recent average, and −79 for the baseline average.

The San Joaquin River panel uses light blue bars. Values are −1,323 in 2021, −1,455 in 2022, 931 in 2023, 463 in 2024, −462 in 2025, −369 for the recent average, and −631 for the baseline average.

The Tulare Lake Basin panel uses brown bars and has a larger vertical scale. Values are −3,971 in 2021, −3,383 in 2022, 5,317 in 2023, 706 in 2024, −1,380 in 2025, −542 for the recent average, and −1,209 for the baseline average.

Alt-text:

Three-panel bar chart of aquifer-storage changes in the Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin River, and Tulare Lake Basin from 2021–2025, compared with recent and baseline averages.
Figure 5. Results from 2026 PPIC assessment of recent overdraft and SGMA progress.

What will happen in 2027?

Nobody really knows, but expect much speculation from now until March 2027. Only by March (and sometimes mid-April) is it late enough in California’s mercurial wet season to have already seen and reasonably predict the water year’s overall precipitation and water availability conditions. 

A scatter plot titled “1-year Correlation of Annual Precipitation for Northern Sacramento Valley (1921–2019).” The horizontal axis shows first water-year total precipitation from 0 to 100 inches, and the vertical axis shows second water-year total precipitation from 0 to 100 inches. Numerous hollow circular data points are scattered across the graph, with most clustered between approximately 30 and 70 inches on both axes. A thick black best-fit line runs nearly horizontally at about 50 inches. The plotted relationship is close to flat, with points distributed widely above and below the line. The lower-right corner displays the regression equation and R-squared value.

Alt-text:

Scatter plot of first- and second-year precipitation totals in the Northern Sacramento Valley, showing widely scattered data and an almost horizontal trend line near 50 inches.
Figure 6. Last year’s Sacramento Valley precipitation has no correlation with the next year’s precipitation (DWR data, CDEC).

Statistically, there is essentially no correlation of precipitation in northern California from one year to the next, as seen in Figure 6. Similarly, there is only about 1.2% simple correlation between El Niño conditions and runoff from northern California (Figure 7). El Niño-runoff correlations are a bit stronger in southern California. (There is a little more correlation in streamflow from one year to the next, mostly driven by overyear groundwater storage.)

A scatter plot shows the relationship between ENSO Average Index values and water-year flow, measured in million acre-feet (maf). Approximately 50 blue diamond markers are distributed across the graph, with water-year flow values ranging from about 5 to 38 maf and ENSO Average Index values ranging from about −1.6 to 1.9. A nearly horizontal black trendline runs through the points, indicating a very weak positive relationship. The plot includes gray horizontal gridlines and vertical reference lines, with the axes labeled and numbered.

Alt-text:

Scatter plot of water-year flow versus ENSO Average Index, showing widely dispersed blue data points and a nearly horizontal trendline.
Figure 7. Classical El Niño estimates don’t help much in predicting northern California’s annual runoff (CDEC data).

Forecasting storms more than a few days becomes increasingly uncertain. 

Today, with an extreme El Niño forecast, California flood management is benefiting from the popular and political attention, even if it does not actually result in flooding. (Although the variance in northern California runoff might increase with El Niño.)

Sometimes in life, and always with California water, all we can do is prudently prepare for extremes and surprises. Preparing for a range of future conditions is central to California water management.  Sometimes useful political and popular attention is based more on fashionable and scienterrific, rather than technical, thinking.  Decision-making is not entirely rational.

The Future

“There is rarely a shortage of water, but often shortages of cheap water.” – common water economist saying (see Note 1).

The future seems likely to have less water availability for California than it has become used to historically. This will be mostly from eliminating overdrafting from California’s groundwater and Colorado River reservoirs, plus climate change and needs for additional environmental water dedications (Lund et al. 2024). Water scarcity will be a growing challenge.

What to do?

Every year, water managers and users must prepare for both flood and drought, in addition to their other duties.

Californians should pay attention to water and likely climate changes, without complacency or panic over our effective but flawed water management system and institutions. Changes are needed to develop coordinated (perhaps consolidated) technical work by the DWR and SWRCB in groundwater modeling, regional water balances, and other areas for SGMA implementation and other challenges (particularly regarding ecosystems). Complacency and panic are convenient rhetorically and for fund-raising, but they also are expensive and risky reactions to situations that deserve serious and more constructive thought, analysis, and deliberations.

Today, most of our water deliberations and analyses remain relics of the history of water infrastructure and allocation for agricultural and urban growth. They are not without value but need improvements to help us adapt to a changing climate, ecosystems, economy, and social concerns.

Take advantage of these less urgent average years to think hard and discuss such challenges soberly with others, especially those outside your current advocacy identity. These long-term conversations should seek to focus on long-term issues and eschew short-term advantage. (Clearly, I’ve retired.)

For 2027, we will have a new Governor and new leaders for  many of the State’s water agencies and legislative committees, as well as many regional and local water agencies and stakeholders. These folks will face challenges, and they will need help. So, drink (water) to celebrate the opportunities of this new water year. 

About the Author

Jay Lund is an Emeritus Distinguished Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Vice Director of the Center for Watershed Sciences at the University of California – Davis. 

Further Reading

Note 1 – The origins of this quote might come from: ‘David S. Jenkins, the man who heads up the Department of Interior’s Office of Saline Water, points out that there really is no shortage of water. ‘There’s a shortage of cheap water,’ he says. ‘We have all the water anyone will ever need in our oceans. The trick is to desalt it and put it where we want it at reasonable cost.’” 

– Popular Mechanics, May 1959, p. 119. [Provided by Gemini]

Sharing


Discover more from California WaterBlog

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Discover more from California WaterBlog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading